Kamis, 15 Januari 2009
Copy paste or the plagiarist?
The proposal from me for friends who will make use of facilities copy paste that indeed was provided to facilitate exchanged mutual information. As in the case of the knife, could in order to slice chilli but also could in order to defend himself
Blog also results of creativity such was our colleague's statement that must be appreciated by us fully bore jawab. the problem of the work was creative this was true or even lead astray that was borne personally opposite the Lord:). That was certain to honour him according to me we were minimal must do the matter along with this:
1. wrote the source aslinya. the obligatory original source was to write his first writer, furthermore where this article emerged the first time, could from the print media, the seminar, blog dsb. if having the address web also obligatory was enclosed, that was certain not cuman his homepage, but to this page. If we will know his first writer, necessarily we wrote the first source :tidak was known (so if having the writer #1 or was written noname, don't very much-time changed him dgn your name :D)
2. wrote our direct source (the reference). was the same his matter as the feeling thank you we to the first writer (or yg wrote/was creative), we must also be grateful to people that mereferensikan information was filled, but because definitely his family tree was long yes apparently that was last we could his information menarik. if having the address web him also obligatory was enclosed through to in details of his page.
SO … not will be buried by his original writer (except has many yg ga honest). if emang the article personally yes wrote then his writer we ourselves, said frightened! And definitely him will be referensinya. if has gitu, still was that his first article claims, that were certain will yell!!! (continued whether his difference with that now, that only last reference loves? ) ”? $%^# = minimised then so that better
Blog also results of creativity such was our colleague's statement that must be appreciated by us fully bore jawab. the problem of the work was creative this was true or even lead astray that was borne personally opposite the Lord:). That was certain to honour him according to me we were minimal must do the matter along with this:
1. wrote the source aslinya. the obligatory original source was to write his first writer, furthermore where this article emerged the first time, could from the print media, the seminar, blog dsb. if having the address web also obligatory was enclosed, that was certain not cuman his homepage, but to this page. If we will know his first writer, necessarily we wrote the first source :tidak was known (so if having the writer #1 or was written noname, don't very much-time changed him dgn your name :D)
2. wrote our direct source (the reference). was the same his matter as the feeling thank you we to the first writer (or yg wrote/was creative), we must also be grateful to people that mereferensikan information was filled, but because definitely his family tree was long yes apparently that was last we could his information menarik. if having the address web him also obligatory was enclosed through to in details of his page.
SO … not will be buried by his original writer (except has many yg ga honest). if emang the article personally yes wrote then his writer we ourselves, said frightened! And definitely him will be referensinya. if has gitu, still was that his first article claims, that were certain will yell!!! (continued whether his difference with that now, that only last reference loves? ) ”? $%^# = minimised then so that better
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
